Oregon Cougar Action Team

Take care of the land, and the land will take care of you. Living fear free with Cougars.

Oregon Cougar Home Page     Top Predators     Cougar donation     Cougar Truths     ORECAT EVENTS     LIVESTOCK SAFETY PLAN, WH      

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/cougar.html

A plummeting cougar population alters the ecosystem at Zion National Park

  • By Eric Jaffe
  • Smithsonian.com, December 01, 2006

It All Falls Down Growing crowds at Utah's Zion National Park have led to the displacement of cougars, the area's top predator, resulting in a devastating series of changes to the region's biodiversity, environmental scientists report.

Compared with a nearby habitat in which cougars still thrive, Zion has fewer cottonwood trees, butterflies, amphibians and wetland plants, and much more deer, according to a paper that appears in the December Biological Conservation.

"The effects have been quite strong and rippled through this ecosystem," says Robert L. Beschta of Oregon State University, who coauthored the study.

Zion's dwindling cougar population traces its roots to the late 1920s, when park management made efforts to increase visitation. By 1934, tourism had risen considerably, attracting some 70,000 visitors a year—about eight times what it had been only a decade earlier. Today the park receives about three million annual visitors.

To measure the impact of the shrinking cougar population, Beschta and William J. Ripple, also of Oregon State, collected census data on Zion's deer populations dating back to the 1930s. They also studied tree rings to estimate the age and abundance of cottonwoods, a favorite food of young deer, and surveyed nearby river banks to gauge the number of butterflies, frogs, lizards and certain plants.

The researchers compared their figures with similar populations from an area next to Zion called North Creek, which has a stable cougar population. They found more deer, fewer young cottonwood trees and less riverbank life in Zion—a difference they attribute to the absence of cougars in the park.

"These major predators are a key component of maintaining biodiversity," Beschta says. "Most people look [around Zion] today and think it's natural, but it's not."

The evidence from Zion suggests a system of trophic cascading, in which a reduced population of top predators has a trickle-down affect on the plants and animals below them in the food chain.

In Zion's case, tourists caused the shy cougar, also called the mountain lion, to flee the area. Deer, which are the cougar's main prey, increased in abundance, leading to a spike in the consumption of young cottonwood trees. These changes contributed to the erosion of riverbanks and a decline in wetland species.

Though trophic cascades have been well-documented in marine life, environmental scientists have debated their presence on land, says biologist Robert T. Paine of the University of Washington, who was not part of the study. Some cascade doubters believe that competition for food regulates deer populations in the absence of a top predator.

"This is a terrific contribution to a growing body of evidence that [cascades] occur in major terrestrial systems," says Paine, who coined the term "trophic cascade" in 1980. Recent studies of shrinking numbers of wolves in Yellowstone National Park have shown similar effects on plant-life.

Restoring at least part of the cougar population could, over time, rebalance Zion's ecosystem. One way to boost the number of predators might be to limit vehicle access to the park, speculates Ripple. When the park implemented a bus system that reduced car traffic in 2000, he says, cougar sightings increased.

Growing crowds at Utah's Zion National Park have led to the displacement of cougars, the area's top predator, resulting in a devastating series of changes to the region's biodiversity, environmental scientists report.

Compared with a nearby habitat in which cougars still thrive, Zion has fewer cottonwood trees, butterflies, amphibians and wetland plants, and much more deer, according to a paper that appears in the December Biological Conservation.

"The effects have been quite strong and rippled through this ecosystem," says Robert L. Beschta of Oregon State University, who coauthored the study.

Zion's dwindling cougar population traces its roots to the late 1920s, when park management made efforts to increase visitation. By 1934, tourism had risen considerably, attracting some 70,000 visitors a year—about eight times what it had been only a decade earlier. Today the park receives about three million annual visitors.

To measure the impact of the shrinking cougar population, Beschta and William J. Ripple, also of Oregon State, collected census data on Zion's deer populations dating back to the 1930s. They also studied tree rings to estimate the age and abundance of cottonwoods, a favorite food of young deer, and surveyed nearby river banks to gauge the number of butterflies, frogs, lizards and certain plants.

The researchers compared their figures with similar populations from an area next to Zion called North Creek, which has a stable cougar population. They found more deer, fewer young cottonwood trees and less riverbank life in Zion—a difference they attribute to the absence of cougars in the park.

"These major predators are a key component of maintaining biodiversity," Beschta says. "Most people look [around Zion] today and think it's natural, but it's not."

The evidence from Zion suggests a system of trophic cascading, in which a reduced population of top predators has a trickle-down affect on the plants and animals below them in the food chain.

In Zion's case, tourists caused the shy cougar, also called the mountain lion, to flee the area. Deer, which are the cougar's main prey, increased in abundance, leading to a spike in the consumption of young cottonwood trees. These changes contributed to the erosion of riverbanks and a decline in wetland species.

Though trophic cascades have been well-documented in marine life, environmental scientists have debated their presence on land, says biologist Robert T. Paine of the University of Washington, who was not part of the study. Some cascade doubters believe that competition for food regulates deer populations in the absence of a top predator.

"This is a terrific contribution to a growing body of evidence that [cascades] occur in major terrestrial systems," says Paine, who coined the term "trophic cascade" in 1980. Recent studies of shrinking numbers of wolves in Yellowstone National Park have shown similar effects on plant-life.

Restoring at least part of the cougar population could, over time, rebalance Zion's ecosystem. One way to boost the number of predators might be to limit vehicle access to the park, speculates Ripple. When the park implemented a bus system that reduced car traffic in 2000, he says, cougar sightings increased.

 

********************************************************************************************************************

Another great resource that William and Robert contributed to is the DVD,

 

 "Lords Of Nature, Life In A Land Of Great Predators." 

 

www.lordsofnature.org, produced by Green Fire Productions with excellent wildlife footage from renowned wildlife cinematographer, Bob Landis. It is a stunning documentary challenging the very survival of species, and literally our own survival as humans if the cougar and other top predators continue to be hunted to genetic or complete extinction.  It is a life out of balance and cause to think again the role these great animals play even in the lives of those living in cities.  As the cougar and cheetah DNA are mysteriously linked, in many ways if not more so, we are mysteriously linked to them. It is a true quantum leap and you will find this DVD shocking.

 

*********************************************************************************************************************

 

Refusal to balance the books with our natural resources and instead remain dependent on a dysfunctional and outdated system to manage our natural resources and wildlife, will destroy the Oregon we have all come to know and love. We pay a heavy price to look the other way. Oregonians need to make decisions about our natural resources that are anchored in truth, not secret meetings and bills passed without regard for public input or support primarily the interests of wealthy private hunting clubs. Yes, people in the city count. You drink from the watershed these cougars help keep healthy. You breath the air the forests help provide for you. Hunters are allowed to shoot pregnant elk. Wild sheep succumb to diseases from domestic sheep, Christmas tree growers have open season on deer (keeping 5 of all the deer they shoot) causing cougar to have less food that contributes to livestock conflict, yet the cougar is wrongfully exploited as the culprit for too many bad management plans that undermine the health and vitality of other species.

 

The problem is not out there in the wilderness or with a species of animal. The problem lies within us.

 

 

 

Photo by Mark Elbroch for Felidae Conservation Fund

 

Why is it that you can kill a mother with depedent young that can't live without her? 

Where is the logic in all this ?? 

  • In the last 100 years 71 USA citizens have been officially attacked by cougar, 3 died, one from rabies. 

 

  • Every year in the USA 1/2 a million US citizens are crippled or disfigured from pet domestic dog attacks, and 100 citizens die from these attacks.  Yet we let the dog sleep at the foot of our bed and killed to genetic extinction cougar in 36 States! 

 

  • Every year more hunters shoot each other and many die from hunting accidents.  I have a hard time calling it an accident when you are looking at the person!  

 

  • You will hear about 2nd and 3rd hand stories about hunter cougar attacks, but truth is most of these are big fish stories or issues the hunters brought on themselves from harassing the great cat.  

 

  • A single cougar's range is about 150 miles.  If there are 10 hunters or persons scattered in this 150 mile range and they all saw the same cougar, is this cougar than counted as one cat or as multiple cats, being that the hunters or persons don't know about the other person or hunters in the area.